adminr, applied to administration

  
<p class="p0"><span style="BACKGROUND: white" lang="EN-US">adminr, applied to administration <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="p0"><span style="BACKGROUND: white" lang="EN-US">of foreign wills <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">h</i>the will annexed, except the granting of ers to others than those entitled as proed by section 1379.Id. 'he nominee for administrator of a nonresnt executor or of any person interested whois himself incompetent for any cause with the single exception of the nominee of the surviving husband or wife, as provided by Code Civ. Proc. | 1365, subd. 1, is in no better position by reason of such nomination than he would have been without it, and it is ineffectual for any purpose.Id.The executor named in a foreign will, as Buch is not authorized to nominate an administrator in the state, and any attempted nomination by him, is ineffectual for any purpose. -Id.Where none of the applicants for administration of a foreign will with the will annexed is interested in the will as provided by Code Civ. Proc.1323, the rules of intestacy controlling in such case <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">held</i>to entitle the public administrator, competent under section 1365, subd. 8, t</span><span style="COLOR: #0066ff; FONT-SIZE: 11.5pt" lang="EN-US"><a href="http://www.ralphlaurensoutletstore.com/">Polo Outlet Online</a> </span><span style="BACKGROUND: white" lang="EN-US">o administer as against one who, though legally competent, was nominated by the nonresident executor who himself was incompetent by reason of nonresidence.Id. 524 Wash. The courts of the forum take no notice of foreign administrations, 'and consequently a foreign executor or administrator cannot sue or defend in his representative capacity.In re Goss Estate, 132 P. 409.EXEMPTIONS.See Homestead; Indians,20.EXPERT TESTIMONY.See Criminal Law,338, 478, 485; Evidence, <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">it</i>471-572.EXPLOSIVES.See Municipal Corporations,762, 809.9 Wash. An action for misstatements by the sellers of blasting powder, as to the manner of handling it, which are the proximate cause of an injury, may be based either upon deceit or negligence.Marsh v. Usk Hardware Co., 132 P. 241.It is a question of fact whether a circular issued by a manufacturing company, stating their powder to be safe, authorized a dealer to make specific representations as to its use so as to render the manufacturer liable for injuries received by the buyer who used it as instructed.Id.It is a question of fact for the jury whether representations made by the manufacturer and seller of blasting powder were sufficient to induce a reasonable man to tamp t</span><span style="COLOR: #0066ff; FONT-SIZE: 11.5pt" lang="EN-US"><a href="http://www.ralphlaurensoutletstore.com/">http://www.ralphlaurensoutletstore.com/</a> </span><span style="BACKGROUND: white" lang="EN-US">he powder with an iron bar.Id.One wh</span><span style="COLOR: #0066ff; FONT-SIZE: 11.5pt" lang="EN-US"><a href="http://www.ralphlaurensoutletstore.com/">Ralph Lauren Outlet Online</a> </span><span style="BACKGROUND: white" lang="EN-US">o sells an explosive with an affirmative representation of safety is liable to any person injur</span><span style="COLOR: #0066ff; FONT-SIZE: 11.5pt" lang="EN-US"><a href="http://www.ralphlaurensoutletstore.com/"><strong>Ralph Lauren Outlet</strong></a> </span><span style="BACKGROUND: white" lang="EN-US">ed thereby without fault on his part, regardless of any contractual relation. Id.A retail dealer making specific representations as to the manner of using blasting powder is liable to one injured while using it in the manner directed, even though the dealer did not know the representations to be false.Id.A manufacturer and retailer of blasting powder who each negligently make misrepresentations as to its safety are jointly and severally liable for injuries received by one who relied upon the misrepresentations.Id.Whether a well digger was guilty of contributory negligence in tamping blasting powder with an iron bar <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">held</i>a question for the jury, in view of representations made to him by the manufacturer and seller of the powder as to its safety.-Id.EX POST FACTO LAWS.See Constitutional Law, $ 203; Statutes,263. Extradition 132 PACIFICEXTRADITION.See Habeas Corpus,21. 85, 92.II. INTERSTATE. 24 Wyo. Where an alleged fugitive from justice is demanded under Rev. St. U. S.5278 U. S. Conip. St. 1901, p. 3597, and a copy of the indictment against the accused or an affidavit charging him with the crime against the laws properly authenticated and made before a magistrate of the demanding state, it is the duty of the executive of the state where the fugitive is found to cause him to be arrested and returned.Kyan v. Rogers, 132 P. 95. 30 Wyo. Where one charged with crime leaves the state where the crime was alleged to have been committed in any way or for any reason, and is thereafter found in another state, he is a fugitive from justice and subject to extradition.Ryan v. <o:p></o:p></span></p>