guardian's bond were liable

  
<p class="p0"><span style="BACKGROUND: white" lang="EN-US">guardian's bond were liable<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="p0"><span style="BACKGROUND: white" lang="EN-US"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>for moneys misappropriated by him as such guardian, whether before or after the execution of the bond.People's Bank ; Trust Co. v. Nelson, 132 P. 493.dence of an alibi <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">held</i>not so clear and Ht? factory as to require a determination nv plaintiff was not a fugitive from the justice <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">4</i>the demanding state.Id. 92 Wyo. One arrested as a fugitive fee justice is entitled as of right on habeas ctrpa to show that he is not a fugitive from <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">tk</i>jotice of the demanding state, and overcom presumption to the contrary arising free ::face of the extradition warrantRyan <span style="FONT-VARIANT: small-caps">T.</span>Raers, 132 P. 95. 99 Kan. A parent who is a suitable pe son is entitled to the custody of his child<i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">\</i>matter of right against any one not its para; whether it might be better provided to: t</span><span style="COLOR: #0066ff; FONT-SIZE: 11.5pt" lang="EN-US"><a href="http://www.ralphlaurensoutletstore.com/">Polo Outlet Online</a></span><span style="BACKGROUND: white" lang="EN-US">; some one else or notEx parte Bollinger, !￡ P. 1181.On the death of a mother to whom, on bt granting of a divorce, the custody of a has been awarded, the right to its custod;:: crues to the father, if a suitable person.-li 113 Wash. Where, on appeal from in i der denying a writ of habeas corpus, appelir had filed no brief, assigned no errors, aod j sented no oral argument at the time his n was called for trial, it would be dismissfi-Fj paite Orlofsky, 132 P. 219. 116 N.M. Under Corap. Laws lSSUSi: providing that the officer granting a writ if habeas co</span><span style="COLOR: #0066ff; FONT-SIZE: 11.5pt" lang="EN-US"><a href="http://www.ralphlaurensoutletstore.com/">http://www.ralphlaurensoutletstore.com/</a> </span><span style="BACKGROUND: white" lang="EN-US">rpus may require a bond for rthe court must tax costs in such proceafc. however burdensome the statute may bt-t; parte Fullen, 132 P. 1137.Under Comp. Laws 1897,2812, ??.? rapher's fees for sending up tie record ipt certiorari are taxable.Id.HABEAS CORPUS.I. NATURE AND GROUNDS OF REMEDY. 4 Kan. An error in overruling a plea of former jeopardy does not entitle the prisoner to a discharge on habeas corpus, but it must be corrected on appeal.Ex parte iano, 132 P. 999. 21 Wyo. H</span><span style="COLOR: #0066ff; FONT-SIZE: 11.5pt" lang="EN-US"><a href="http://www.ralphlaurensoutletstore.com/">Ralph Lauren Outlet Online</a> </span><span style="BACKGROUND: white" lang="EN-US">abeas corpus is a proper proceeding to determine whether accused is a fugitive from justice, and subject to return to another state in extradition proceedings.Ryan v. Rogers, 132 P. 95. 28 Or. Proceedings in mandamus being, under L. 0. L.552, stayed by the perfecting of an appeal therein wit</span><span style="COLOR: #0066ff; FONT-SIZE: 11.5pt" lang="EN-US"><a href="http://www.ralphlaurensoutletstore.com/"><strong>Ralph Lauren Outlet</strong></a> </span><span style="BACKGROUND: white" lang="EN-US">h an undertaking for the appeal only, the court exceeds its jurisdiction, within section 642, as to discharge from custody on habeas corpus, by proceeding, pending the appeal, to enforce obedience to the peremptory writ of mandamus by contempt proceedings.Ex parte Vinton, 132 P. 1105.II. JURISDICTION, PROCEEDINGS, AND RELIEF. 85 Wyo. Where plaintiff waa arrested on a foreign indictment against C, and in habeas corpus proceedings denied that was the person for whom the warrant was intended, the burden was on the demanding state to introduce some evidence identifying plaintiff as the person indicted.Ryan v. Rogers, 132 P. 95.In habeas corpus to obtain plaintiff's discharge from arrest under an extradition warrant, eviHARMLESS ERROR.See Appeal and Error, f1 1032-1071; Home;338.HEALTH.II. REGULATIONS AND OFFEfSIi21 Cal.App. The provisions of Tassel House Act,85, as to manner of constroctisJ such buildings, being for protection against E protection and preservation of public ttut and for safety of those entering and occtprS such buildings, and not shown to be <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">wr-x-</i>able, are within tbe police power.El <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">fO</i>Stoltenberg, 132 P. 841.HEARING.See Railroads,9.HEARSAY EVIDENCESee Criminal Law,419, 420; Eriden 318.HEAT.See Landlord and Tenant,124. 233.HERDERS' LIENS.See Animals,26.tion for a public highway.Parrott v. Stewart, 132 P. 523. 8 Or. Where the use of land by those traveling under it were not under a claim of right adverse to the owner, who merely permitted travel for convenience, the use did not establish a highway by prescription, though continuing for the statutory period.Parrott v. Stewart, 132 P. 523.II Establishment by Statute or Statutory Proceeding?!.41 Kan. Dawa 1874, c. 108,7, required the commissioners of highways to <o:p></o:p></span></p>