proximity to dwelli

  
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="COLOR: #0066ff; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.5pt" lang="EN-US">proximity to dwelli<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="COLOR: #0066ff; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.5pt" lang="EN-US">gs, be so offensive to those residing in the vicinity as to constitute a nuisance.Ed. Note.For <a href="http://www.ralphlaurensoutlet-online.com/"><strong>Ralph Lauren Outlet</strong></a> other cases, see Municipal Corporations, Cent Dig. §§ 1347, 134S; Dec. Dig. § 613.4. CONSTITUTIONALLAW§ 70JUDICIALPOWERS REGULATIONOFOCCUPATIONSANDBUSINESS.Whether brickyards can be pursued in a residential district of a city without causing undue annoyance to persons living in the district is a question on which reasonable minds may differ, and hence the propriety of prohibiting the business within residence districts is exclusively for legislative determination.Ed. Note.For other cases, see Constitutional Law, Cent Dig. §§ 129-132,137; Dec. Dig. § 70.5. CONSTITUTIONALLAWg 81POLICSPOWERREGULATIONOFBUSINESS.The right of the Legislature in the exercise of the police power to regulate or prohibit a given business is not limited by the fact that the value of the investments made in the business prior to legislation will be greatly diminished; for a business which when established was unobjectionable may by the growth of population in the vicinity become a source of danger to the health and comfort of the occupants of the territory, and the Legislature may then prohibit its further conductEd. Note.For other cases, see Constitutional Law, Cent Dig. § 148; Dec Dig. § 81.6. CONSTITUTIONALLAWf| 81POLICEPOWERREGULATIONOFBUSINESS.The power to regulate the use of property or a business may not be arbitrarily exercised, but http://www.ralphlaurensoutlet-online.com the restrictions imposed must bear a reasonable relation to some legitimate purpos within the purview of the police power.Ed. Note.For other cases, see Constitutional Law, <a href="http://www.ralphlaurensoutlet-online.com/"><strong>Cheap Ralph Lauren Polo</strong></a> Cent Dig. § 148; Dec. Dig. § 81.7. CONSTITUTIONALLAW§ 87PRIVAWRIGHTS POLICEPOWER PRonraiTiso BUSINESSINRESIDENTIALDISTRICTS.Where the region surrounding a brickyard in a city has become primarily a residentiil section and the occupants of neighboring dwellings are seriously discommoded by the operations of the yard, a prohibition of the business in the district is not objectionable as a mere arbitrary invasion of private right hut is i valid exercise of police power to prevent injury to others.Ed. Note.For other cases, see Constitutional Law, Cent Dig. §§ 156-171; Dec. Dig. IR7 1S. MUNICIPALCOBPOBATIONS| 63POLICBPOWEBPBOHIBITINQ BUSINESS IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTSVALIDITY.Where there are reasons justifying the prohibition of a business within an area described; in an ordinance adopted by a city, the court in determining the validity of the prohibition will not determine whether conditions in other parts of the city require a like prohibition; for that presents a legislative question.Ed. Note.For other cases, see Municipal Corporations, Cent Dig. §§ 155, 1378, 1879; Dec. Dig. § 63.In Bank. Application for writ <a href="http://www.ralphlaurensoutlet-online.com/"><strong>Cheap Ralph Lauren</strong></a> of habeas corpus by J.. C. Hadacheck against C. E. Sebastian, Chief of Police of the City of Los Angeles, for the discharge of the applicant from custody under a complaint charging a violation of an ordinance of the city. Writ discharged, and prisoner remanded to the custody of the Chief of Police.G. C. De Garmo and Emmet H. Wilson, both of Los Angeles, for petitioner. Hay E. Nlmmo, of Los Angeles, for respondentSLOSS, J. A writ of habeas corpus was issued by this court on the petition of J. C. Hadacheck, who alleged that he was held in custody under a complaint charging him with the violation of an ordinance of the city of Los Angeles, adopted In April, 1910, and designated No. 19,989, new series. The validity of the ordinance presents the sole question to be here determined.By the terms of the enactment, It was declared to be unlawful for any person, firm, or <a href="http://www.ralphlaurensoutlet-online.com/"><strong>Ralph Lauren</strong></a> corporation to establish, conduct, operate, or maintain, or to cause or permit to be established, operated, or maintained, any brickyard or brick kiln, or any establishment, factory, or place for <o:p></o:p></span></p>